| Author | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
LurkerMike |
Re: Mileage Markers | ||
|
I wonder if that dang Bigfoot family or a group of space (or illegal for that matter) aliens is moving the markers around at night again?
|
|||
The Vikings |
Re: Mileage Markers | ||
|
I too noticed the differences in the mile markers. Someone explained it as a result of the trail being built in sections, it made sense to me.
|
|||
Malum Prohibitum |
Re: Mileage Markers | ||
|
Can't this be fixed by volunteers?
Are people on this forum also members of the volunteer organizations that maintain the trail? |
|||
tcrider |
Re: Mileage Markers | ||
|
Good topic and I often wonder why my GPS reciever is not showing the same mileage as the mileage markers. Clearly one of them is wrong (or they both could be wrong).
I agree it's probably better not to be too concerned about such things, but that goes against my obsessive nature. Anyway, I usually just trust my GPS although it does frustrate me. I suppose that's a good point above to just be consistent with what you use and then it is all relative. By "mileage markers" do you mean those little signs that periodically give the length of the trail at that point, or are there markers every mile? I've never noticed those if they exist. |
|||
LurkerMike |
Re: Mileage Markers | ||
|
There are mile markers at most every mile in Paulding County but only a few in Cobb, if any.
You probably need to start at 0 mile at Mavel with one of those wheels that you push with a handle that measures mileage... except that the wheel must be calibrated too or you won't be accurate with that method either... But that would be faster than "pulling chains" which is what surveyors used to do to measure distances. Now they use digital distance meters but they require tripod mounting of the instrument and the target and progress down the trail would be slow... by any accurate surveying method, it would take a couple of weeks or so to get through the 60 miles... Now if we measure the mileage so that it can be marked accurately, do we do topo or statute miles? In other words, if the land were flat, one mile on a map would be one mile on the ground. But since there are hills and valleys, most miles on the ground will appear shorter than a mile when marked on a map. I suspect that is how the mile markers got like they are. Some were measured by the actual distance of asphalt between the markers and others were plotted on a flat map and the corresponding points on the trail is where the markers were planted. I like the actual rolling distance, not the map distance. That way you can compare what your odometer is reading to the markers like on most interstates. |
|||
rollingwheels |
Re: Mileage Markers | ||
|
That may explain why the mile over the trestle is shorter. Perhaps it is measured on the ground underneath the trestle?
|
|||
crewchf |
Re: Mileage Markers | ||
|
Nope, you're all missing it!!! There's lots of older folks like Me and Mrs Crew Chief living in Paulding Co so they shorten the miles for us!!!!
Crew Chief |
|||
TrailForumOwner |
|||
|
I think the story goes something like:
When the trail was initially opened and the mile markers set, they were spaced 1 mile apart from each other in a straight line. This doesn't take into account curves in the trail or changes in elevation. |
|||
Please continue to support our friends at TrailExpress
South Appalachian Bicycle Association
The Biking Weatherman's Chief Ladiga Trail Page
Pay us a visit!